SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Ker) 790

K.HEMA
Jose – Appellant
Versus
P C Joy – Respondent


ORDER

K. Hema, J.

1. The revision petitioner was convicted and sentenced by the Magistrate court to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 5 months for offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short the Act). The revision petitioner-accused was also directed to pay a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- as compensation under section 357(3) of Cr.P.C. and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 2 months.

2. In appeal, the conviction was confirmed by the Sessions Court but the sentence of 5 months was modified to simple imprisonment till rising of the court. The compensation was confirmed. The said conviction and sentence are challenged by the accused in Cr.R.P.No.4487 of 2006. The complainant filed a revision (Crl.R.P.3275/06) challenging the illegality of the sentence passed. Both these revisions are heard together and disposed of by this common judgment.

3. Facts briefly: (The parties will be referred to as complainant and accused, for convenience sake). The accused allegedly gave Ext.P1 cheque in discharge of a debt/liability which he owed towards the complainant. The cheque, on presentation, was dishonoured on the ground of insufficiency of fund.

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top