SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Ker) 679

K.HEMA
Kavungal Koopakkattu Zeenath – Appellant
Versus
Mundakattu Sulfiker Ali – Respondent


ORDER

K. Hema, J.

1. Can the court dismiss a petition for maintenance filed under section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (the Code, for short), on the ground that a decree is passed against the wife, in a petition for restitution of conjugal rights?

2. The revision petitioners are the wife and minor son of the respondent herein. They filed petition before the Family Court, claiming maintenance from respondent, under section 125 of the code. The claim made by the wife was rejected, but maintenance was ordered in favour of the child at the rate of Rs.500/- per month. The challenge in this revision is only against rejection of maintenance to the wife. It is made clear at the time of hearing that the quantum of maintenance allowance ordered in favour of the child is not being challenged.

3. The parties were married in 1998 and the second petitioner was born in the wed-lock. The respondent is having sufficient means as he is engaged in stone-quarrying. He earns Rs.50,000/- per month out of his work. He allegedly neglected the wife and child and did not even meet any necessary expenses. She left the house of the husband along with her child because of the cruelty inflicted by her hus














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top