Karnataka HC Notices Sri Lankan Judge's Rights Plea
07 Mar 2026
Karnataka Proposes Social Media Ban for Under-16s
07 Mar 2026
Justice Dharmadhikari Sworn In as 55th Madras HC Chief Justice
07 Mar 2026
Punjab HC Acquits Ram Rahim in Journalist Murder
07 Mar 2026
Appellate Courts Can Rely on Unexhibited Public Documents Produced by Plaintiff: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
K.BHASKARAN
K. Chandri – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
K. Bhaskaran, J.
1. The facts are brief and are not in dispute. The petitioner qualified to hold the post of language teacher Hindi) in High School was appointed in a leave vacancy by the 3rd respondent, the Manager, Calicut Girls High School from 23rd November 1972 to 31st January 1973. The petitioner was relieved from that post when the vacancy terminated. During the academic year 1977-78 as per the staff fixation order a post of language teacher (Hindi) was sanctioned for the said High School. The petitioner made an application on 30th May 1977 in anticipation of this post which as a matter of fact was subsequently sanctioned on 15th July 1977, claiming protection under R.51A of Chap.14A of the Kerala Education Rules, 1959 (the rules). She also made a further application dated 20th July 1977, a true copy of which is Ext. P1. The 3rd respondent, however, appointed the 4th respondent as a teacher in the Upper primary section with effect from 14th July 1977, and appointed the 4th respondent as a High School Assistant with effect from 19th September 1977, keeping the post sanctioned from 1
The main legal point established in the judgment is that when there is a conflict between the provisions of R.51A and R.43 of the Kerala Education Rules, 1959, the former should give way to the latte....
The manager's discretion in teacher appointments is subject to established preference rights under the Kerala Education Rules.
Managers of aided schools possess discretion in teacher appointments unless a clear preferential claim exists by law.
Point of Law : Rule 53 of Chapter XIV(A) KER reads as A teacher shall not himself terminate his service before the expiry of the term of his appointment without the permission of the Educational Offi....
Right of a teacher under Rule 43 Chapter XIV (A) KER cannot be infringed by state through an executive order.
Promotion eligibility requires the satisfaction of qualifications at the time of vacancy, with amendments to rules applied retrospectively when appropriate.
A qualified teacher's claim under Rule 51A ceases upon accepting permanent employment in another educational agency, emphasizing employment security.
A teacher who quits service loses entitlement to benefits under Rule 51A of the Kerala Education Rules, 1959.
The court affirmed that appointment to Principal positions in Higher Secondary Schools must align teaching subject qualifications with available posts, emphasizing statutory rights of senior teachers....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that promotions are to be made from persons possessing the prescribed qualifications at the time of occurrence of the vacancy, and the interpretati....
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.