SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Ker) 507

M.M.PAREED PILLAY
Chenaji – Appellant
Versus
Taluk Land Board – Respondent


ORDER

M. M. Pareed Pillai, J.

1. Petitioners 1 and 2 filed application under S.85(8) of the Kerala Land Reforms Act claiming right over 9 cents and 14 cents respectively. Petitioners 3 to 6 are the legal representatives of the declarant Viswanathan Gurukkal. Viswanathan Gurukkal was directed to surrender 13 acres of land by the Taluk Land Board as per Order dated 18-4-1984. One of the legal representatives of Viswanathan Gurukkal filed C.R.P. 1480 of 1984. This Court reduced the extent of land to be surrendered to 12 acres 75 cents. When petitioners 1 and 2 filed applications under S.85(8) legal representatives of Viswanathan Gurukkal filed application stating that there occurred various mistakes in calculating the extent of properties and granting of exemptions and so the matter requires reconsideration. The Taluk Land Board rejected the claim of petitioners 1 and 2 under S.85(8) and also the claim of petitioners 3 to 6 to reopen the matter.

2. Counsel for the petitioners submitted that when the Taluk Land Board considered the matter earlier there was no serious attempt to adduce proper evidence in the case, that there are kudiyiruppus and public roads which were omitted to be mentio








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top