M.M.PAREED PILLAY
Chenaji – Appellant
Versus
Taluk Land Board – Respondent
M. M. Pareed Pillai, J.
1. Petitioners 1 and 2 filed application under S.85(8) of the Kerala Land Reforms Act claiming right over 9 cents and 14 cents respectively. Petitioners 3 to 6 are the legal representatives of the declarant Viswanathan Gurukkal. Viswanathan Gurukkal was directed to surrender 13 acres of land by the Taluk Land Board as per Order dated 18-4-1984. One of the legal representatives of Viswanathan Gurukkal filed C.R.P. 1480 of 1984. This Court reduced the extent of land to be surrendered to 12 acres 75 cents. When petitioners 1 and 2 filed applications under S.85(8) legal representatives of Viswanathan Gurukkal filed application stating that there occurred various mistakes in calculating the extent of properties and granting of exemptions and so the matter requires reconsideration. The Taluk Land Board rejected the claim of petitioners 1 and 2 under S.85(8) and also the claim of petitioners 3 to 6 to reopen the matter.
2. Counsel for the petitioners submitted that when the Taluk Land Board considered the matter earlier there was no serious attempt to adduce proper evidence in the case, that there are kudiyiruppus and public roads which were omitted to be mentio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.