SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Ker) 684

HARUN UL RASHID
J. Sarojini Alias Nesamma – Appellant
Versus
Narayani Sarojini – Respondent


ORDER

1. This revision petition is filed by the plaintiffs in O.S. 2452/1990 who are aggrieved by the order passed by the Court below in an application filed by them under Section 152 of the C.P.C. for correction of certain mistakes which had crept in the description of the property scheduled to the plaint and so in the decree.

2. According to the revision petitioners the survey number of the scheduled property shown in the plaint was a mistake and all other entries are correct. The survey number alone had been wrongly described but this wrong description did not in any way affect the identity of the property. The only question which arises for consideration is whether on the facts the application for amendment is allowable by invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 152 of the C.P.C. Section 152 reads as follows:

"Clerical or arithmetical mistakes in judgments, decrees or orders or errors arising therein from any accidental slip or omission may at any time be corrected by the Court either of its own motion or on the application of any of the parties."

3. The question as to the powers of the Court under Section 152 of the C.P.C. to amend the errors in a decree although the















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top