SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Ker) 485

P.A.MOHAMMED
Anitha – Appellant
Versus
Bava – Respondent


ORDER

P.A. Mohammed, J.

1. This is a case where civil court has initiated criminal prosecution against a party - litigant in a civil litigation. The question raised is whether the civil court has inherent power to initiate criminal proceedings under S.151 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

2. The facts required for the disposal of this case are briefly stated hereunder : The first petitioner who was residing in Bombay had agreed to sell her property through her power of attorney holder, the second petitioner, to the respondent, who had advanced an amount of Rs. 10,000/-. However, the transaction between the petitioners and the respondent did not take place and later it ended in the suit, O.S. No. 197/88 before the Munsiff's Court, Kodungallur. The said suit was filed by the respondent herein for realisation of the money advanced by him to the petitioners. He filed I.A. 664 of 1988 for attachment of plaint schedule property in O. S. No 197/88. In that proceedings, the petitioners took an undertaking before the court that the property would not be sold without obtaining permission from the court. However, the property was sold in violation of the said undertaking. Thereafter the respondent
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top