SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Ker) 475

P.A.MOHAMMED
Chellammal – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


JUDGMENT

P.A. Mohammed, J.

1. In this writ petition, the landlord of a non residential building challenges Ext. P5 order passed by the second respondent - Accommodation Controller under S.17(2) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 (for short the Act). Third respondent is the tenant of the building. He filed Ext. P1 petition before the second respondent alleging that the writ petitioner landlord failed to make periodical maintenance and repairs of the building let out to him on rental basis. The landlord filed Ext. P2 objection wherein it was contended that damage to the building was caused by the tenant and maintenance sought to be done would not come within the scope of periodical maintenance and necessary repairs of the building, in which case Ext. P1 petition itself was not maintainable. However, the Accommodation Controller by Ext. P3 order directed the landlord to make immediate arrangements to effects repairs of the building. It was in that circumstance the present writ petition was filed by the landlord.

2. After admitting the writ petition this court in C. M. P. No. 8857 of 1990 passed the following interim order.

''Both sides may file estimates of the cos









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top