P.T.RAMAN NAYAR
Choyikutty – Appellant
Versus
Vasu – Respondent
P.T. Raman Nayar, J.
1. This appeal and this revision petition are by the same person against the same order, an order made under section 52(1) of the Malabar Tenancy (Amendment) Act XXXIII of 1951. Uncertain which remedy really lay he has, by way of abundant caution, pursued both. The appeal was before the District Court, Kozhikode and it has been withdrawn to this court for hearing along with the revision petition.
2. The dispute is over a piece of land (a paramba) measuring 431/2 X 391/2 six foot koles, or 1.42 acres. There is a dwelling house in the property which was valued by the commissioner in 1948 at Rs. 198/- and odd. On 29-11-1944, the appellant revision-petitioner (whom I shall hereafter call the appellant) bought the jenmom right in the property. The property was at the time outstanding on kanom with the respondents, and, in O. S. 880 of 1945 of the District Munsiff's Court, Kozhikode, a suit instituted on 25-7-1945, the appellant obtained a decree for eviction against the respondents under section 20(5) of the Malabar Tenancy Act 1929 (hereinafter called the principal Act) as it then stood. The decree was made on 21-6-1948, after Madras Act XXIV of 1945 had come
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.