SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Ker) 367

K.T.THOMAS, P.SHANMUGAM
Concrete Aggregate Industries – Appellant
Versus
Abdul Khader – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. Respondents 8 & 9 in the Original Petition are the appellants. The O.P. was filed by an Association and three other residents of Kummanode challenging the running of the quarry by the appellants herein on the ground of pollution and violations of statutory provisions. Learned single Judge held that the appellant firm has to obtain licences required under different statutes as indicated in the judgment before continuing its operations. Appeal is against this judgment.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants fairly concedes that the appellants ought to take out the required licences and permissions under the various statutes. But their only objection is to the observation of the learned single Judge that the appellants should take out a separate licence under items 84 & 87 in the schedule to the Kerala Panchayats (Licensing of Dangerous and Offensive Trades and Factories) Ruler,1963; hereinafter referred to as the Rules. As the appellants have obtained all other permissions and licences and they do not have any objection also to fulfill, satisfy and obtain any other required licences excepting separate licences as indicated by the learned single Judge under













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top