J.B. Koshy, J

1. Both these revision petitions are filed by the tenants mother and son. Respondent landlord filed RCP No. 30 of 1987 before the Rent Control Court, Ottapalam for eviction of the tenant under S.11(2), 11(3), 11(4)(i) and S.11(4)(v) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act). It is contended that there is default in payment of rent, bona fide need of the premises in question for starting a business in stationary for landlord's son Abdul Jaleel, unauthorised subleasing of the premises by the first revision petitioner to the second revision petitioner and cessation of occupation of the premises continuously for a period of more than six months. The Rent Control Court found that the premises was sublet. It was also found that eventhough the Rent Deed was in favour of the first revision petitioner (mother) her son was in possession of the petition scheduled building and was conducting business in Kerosene under the name and style Jayabharath Oil Agencies, the rent receipts have been issued in the name of the second petitioner son and the transfer of possession from the first revision petitioner to second petitioner was ac