K. Balakrishnan Nair, J.

1. The respondents in the writ petition are the appellants. The respondent herein filed the Writ Petition challenging the orders passed against him in the disciplinary proceedings, which finally resulted in discharge of the petitioner from service. Ext. P3 is the order, as per which he was removed from service by the 2nd appellant. He filed an appeal before the 3rd appellant Chief of the Army Staff. The said appeal was dismissed by Ext. P8. The petitioner claimed, he filed Ext. P9 revision against Ext. P8 before the Government, but no action was taken on it. In the above background, this Writ Petition was filed, challenging, inter alia, Exts. P3 and P8 and also seeking a further direction to the Central Government to consider Ext. P9. The case was posted for instructions several times to find out whether Ext. P9 was received and pending. In the absence of any instructions being furnished by the appellants to the Assistant Solicitor General, finally, this Court disposed of the Writ Petition directing the Government to consider and pass orders on Ext. P9. The Writ Appeal is filed raising the following contentions.

i) This Court has no territorial jurisd