Thomas P.Joseph, J.

1. These revisions are in challenge of separate orders passed by learned Judicial First Class Magistrate, Chalakkudy in CC No. 150 of 2000. Petitioner who is the complainant in the Court below requested that Court to reopen the case to adduce further oral and documentary evidence. He also requested that the original of a partnership deed which is alleged to be forged by respondent Nos. 6 be summoned from one P. V. George. Learned Magistrate dismissed the petitions.

2. Facts necessary for consideration of these revisions are: Petitioner, along with respondent Nos. 1 to 5 had formed a partnership by name 'Johnson Enterprises' which was engaged in money lending business. In the year 1982at a time when according to the petitioner he was abroad, respondent Nos. 1 to 5 with the connivance of respondent No.6createdapartnership deed forging signature of petitioner and formed a new partnership by name 'M/s. Chalakudy Auto Finance'. In the year 1984 one of partners of M/s.Chalakudy Auto Finance, one P. V. George filed OS No. 518 of 1994 in the Court of learned Munsiff Irinjalakuda for dissolution of that partnership. Petitioner was impleaded as defendant No. 12 in that suit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document