SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Ker) 560

DATLA JOGI JAGANNADHA RAJU
P. K. Mohankumar – Appellant
Versus
Dy Labour Commissioner – Respondent


JUDGMENT

D.J. Jagannadha Raju, J.

1. This O.P. is filed by the petitioner, who is a partner of Malabar Tile Works, Feroke, and who has been appointed as receiver by Court in O.S. No. 237 of 1984. The petitioner prays for the relief of quashing Ext. P2 order dated 13.12.1985 passed by the Deputy Labour Commissioner, the authority appointed under Section 21 of the Payment of Bonus Act, in Bonus Application No. 2 of 1984.

2. The short question that arises for consideration in this O.P. is whether the lay-off compensation paid to the employees is to be considered as "salary" or "wages" under the Payment of Bonus Act (hereinafter called the "Act") for the purpose of determining the bonus payable to the employees.

3. When the matter was taken up, the petitioner's counsel brought to my notice order dated 10.8.1990 passed by T.L. Viswanatha Iyer, J in O.P.No. 1779 of 1986, and requested that as His Lordship was pleased to refer an identical matter for consideration by a Division Bench, the present O.P. may also be referred to a Division Bench. I am unable to accede to this request. In that order my learned Brother referred to Nutan Mills v. E.S.I Corporation, AIR 1956 Bom. 336, which deafs wit






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top