SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Ker) 504

MAMIDANA JAGANNADHA RAO, K.SREEDHARAN
K. N. Gangadharan Nair – Appellant
Versus
George O Thettayil – Respondent


JUDGMENT

K. Sreedharan, J.

1. Respondents 3 to 8 in O. P. 8768 of 1993 are the appellants. They were members of the Board of Directors of second respondent, the Vengoor Service Cooperative Society Ltd. No, 2793, Vengoor, for two consecutive terms. They filed nominations for contesting the election that was to be held on 18-7-1993, which was the third term. Their entitlement for contesting the election on the ground of the bar created by bye law No. 32 of the bye laws of the Society was questioned before the Returning Officer. Returning Officer rejected those objections and accepted nomination filed by respondents 3 to 8 in the Original Petition who are the appellants herein. Writ petitioner challenged this action of the Returning Officer in O. P. 8768 of 1993. By judgment dated 16-7-1993, the learned Single Judge allowed the writ petition declared and that respondents 3 to 8 (appellants herein), except 7th respondent, are not entitled to contest the election in view of the bar created by bye law 32. Appellants challenge this decision rendered by the learned Single Judge

2. By virtue of the decision of the learned Single Judge, appellants could not contest the election which was held o














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top