SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Ker) 422

High Court of Kerala
K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.
K V Sailesh - Appellant
Versus
K P S C - Respondent
O.P. No. 14595 of 1995
Decided On : 08-12-1995

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the qualification prescribed by the Central Government under Section 213 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, would prevail over the qualification laid down in the Special Rules for the Kerala Transport Subordinate Service.

Headnote:

qualification - appointment to post of Assistant Motor Vehicle Inspector - Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 213 - The court discussed the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 213, and the power of the Central Government to prescribe minimum qualifications for officers in the Motor Vehicles Department. The court held that the qualification prescribed by the Central Government would prevail over the qualification laid down in the Special Rules for the Kerala Transport Subordinate Service.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners, diploma holders in automobile engineering, challenged a notification issued by the Kerala Public Service Commission prescribing diploma in mechanical engineering as an alternative qualification for appointment to the post of Assistant Motor Vehicle Inspector. They contended that this prescription was illegal and violative of the qualification prescribed under the Special Rules for the Kerala Transport Subordinate Service.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the Public Service Commission was fully justified in following the qualification laid down by the Central Government for appointment to the post of Assistant Motor Vehicle Inspector, as per the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 213.

Issues: The issues involved the legality of the qualification prescribed by the Kerala Public Service Commission and the conflict between the qualification prescribed by the Central Government and the qualification laid down in the Special Rules for the Kerala Transport Subordinate Service.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the qualification prescribed by the Central Government under Section 213 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, would prevail over the qualification laid down in the Special Rules for the Kerala Transport Subordinate Service.

Final Decision: The Original Petitions were dismissed by the court.

JUDGMENT

K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.

1. Petitioners in both the Original Petitions are diploma holders in automobile engineering, except the third petitioner in O.P.No. 17731 of 1995. Petitioners challenge the notification issued by the Kerala Public Service Commission on 11-7-1995 prescribing diploma in Mech. Engineering as an alternative qualification for diploma in automobile engineering for appointment to the post of Assistant Motor Vehicle Inspector in the Motor Vehicles Department. They contend that the prescription of diploma in mechanical engineering as an alternative qualification is illegal and violative of the qualification prescribed for the said post under the Special Rules for the Kerala Transport Subordinate Service, where diploma in mechanical engineering is not prescribed as an alternative qualification.

2. The Kerala Public Service Commission issued a notification No. R & A (3) 15575/95/GW dated 11-7-1995 published in the Kerala Gazette dated 18-7-1995 inviting applications from the qualified candidates for the post of Assistant Motor Vehicle Inspector in the Motor Vehicles Department of the Government of Kerala. The method of recruitment is stated to be direct recruitment. According to clause (7) of the notification, qualification prescribed is not in conformity with or in accordance with the qualification prescribed under the Special Rules framed under the Act. According to the petitioners, diploma in automobile engineering is recognised by the State as the basic qualification under the Special Rules, whereas the notification prescribes diploma in mechanical engineering as an alternative qualification. Petitioners are fully qualified for appointment to the post of Assistant Motor Vehicle Inspector as per the Special Rules as well as the notification. But they are aggrieved on account of prescription of alternative qualification in violation of the Special Rules with the result that if candidates with diploma in mechanical engineering would also apply for the post, the chances of persons like the petitioners would adversely be affected for getting appointment to the post of Assistant Motor Vehicles Inspector. It is contended by counsel for the petitioners that the Public Service Commission has no jurisdiction to prescribe qualification in violation of the Special Rules. Consequently they have approached this Court praying for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to make selection to the post of Assistant Motor Vehicle Inspector only from among the applicants having SSLC and diploma in automobile engineering and for consequential reliefs.

3. The Public Service Commission, first respondent, has filed a counter affidavit, and a statement has been filed on behalf of the second respondent. It is stated by the first respondent that the Transport Commissioner to Government of Kerala as per letter No. A6-17556/TC/94 dated 1-10-1994 reported 29 vacancies for the post of Assistant Motor Vehicles Inspector. The qualifications noted in the Proforma reporting the vacancies were those stipulated in the Special Rules for the post issued by the Government of Kerala vide G.O.(P) No. 164/PD dated 12-5-1964 as amended in G.O.(P) No. 74/77/PD dated 2-6-1977, which included a minimum educational qualification of SSLC with diploma in automobile engineering. However, the Transport Commissioner later informed that the Government of India as per notification SRO.No. 444(E) dated 12-7-1989 prescribed diploma in mechanical engineering awarded by the State Board of Technical Education as an alternative qualification for diploma in automobile engineering. On the basis of the requisition received from the Transport Commissioner, the Public Service Commission considered the question of notifying the vacancies for the post of Assistant Motor Vehicles Inspector. After analysing the qualification laid down by the Central Government and the qualification laid down by the State Government under the Special Rules, the Public Service Commission d












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top