SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Ker) 622

P.K.IYER BALASUBRAMANYAN, T.M.HASSAN PILLAI
Jnanadas – Appellant
Versus
Cicilet Balaraj – Respondent


JUDGMENT

P.K. Balasubramanyan, J.

1. The appellants in this appeal are not parties to O.P.No.24730 of 1999 filed before this court by respondent No.l herein. The Appellants sought for and obtained permission of this court as per order in C.M.P.No.6150 of 1999 to appeal against the judgment in O.P.No.24730 of 1999.

2. The first respondent herein filed the Original Petition impleading the Circle Inspector of Police and the Sub Inspector of Police, Neyyattinkara and one Rajesh, described as Convenor of Left Democratic Front Election Committee. The prayer in the Original Petition was for issue a writ of mandamus directing the police officers to provide adequate and effective police protection to the life of the petitioner and her family members to have free ingrees to and egress from the property having an extent of 5 cents in survey No. 167/57 l(R.S.No.125.6) of Kunnathukal Village. The first respondent herein, did not disclose in the Original Petition, what exactly was her tital over the property or the transaction on the basis of which she was claiming right and possession over the property. She averred that she had given permission to the third respondent in the Original Petition to p





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top