SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Ker) 628

N.KRISHNAN NAIR
Joseph – Appellant
Versus
Philip Joseph – Respondent


JUDGMENT

N. Krishnan Nair, J.

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 27.6.1994 of the Sessions Judge, Kottayam in Crl. Appeal No.190/92. The case arose on a complaint filed by the petitioner herein before the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Palai, against the respondent herein, alleging the commission of the offence punishable under S.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. After the trial, the learned Magistrate found the respondent (accused) guilty of the offence and convicted him. He was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for three months and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for one month. Aggrieved by the order of conviction and sentence passed by the Magistrate, the respondent herein preferred an appeal before the Sessions Judge, Kottayam. The Sessions Judge, Kottayam allowed the appeal and set aside the conviction and sentence imposed upon the respondent and acquitted him. Aggrieved by the order of acquittal, the complainant has come up with this appeal.

2. The substance of the allegations in the complaint filed before the Magistrate is as follows :

The accused in discharge of an amount of Rs.25,000/- which he borrowed fro








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top