SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Ker) 661

High Court of Kerala
K.A. Abdul Gafoor, J.
Kuttan Pillai - Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala & Ors - Respondent
O.P. No. 3432 of 2001
Decided On : 22-03-2001

Headnote:

Service Rules Kerala, Part III, R. 3 - A - Payment of Gratuity Act 1972 - Companies - Mount due from retired employees - Payment - Corporation - Interest - It is submitted by Government Pleader that petitioner had agreed for recovery of an amount of as per - Therefore Petitioner can get only balance amount if any towards gratuity - In reply thereto petitioner contends that as per provisions contained in Section of Code of Civil Procedure agreement for reduction of any amount from gratuity is void and therefore Annexure A1 cannot be acted upon - Held, There is no reason on part of respondents in delaying balance amount if any beyond delay in paying balance amount beyond on expiry of reasonable time after submission of Annexure is not justified - Therefore respondents shall be liable to pay interest on balance amount with effect from until date of payment - Payment shall be effected with interest payable at any rate within period of three months from date of receipt of copy of this judgment - Petition dismissed.

JUDGMENT

K.A. Abdul Gafoor, J.

1. Petitioner retired from service while working as Last Grade Servant on 1.1.2000. Retiral benefits have been sanctioned to him as per Exts. P1 and P2 orders. In spite of the same, no gratuity has been disbursed to him, petitioner submits.

2. It is submitted by the learned Government Pleader that the petitioner had agreed for recovery of an amount of Rs. 35,738/- as per Annexure-I. Therefore, the petitioner can get only the balance amount, if any, towards gratuity. In reply thereto, petitioner contends that as per the provisions contained in S.60 of the Code of Civil Procedure, agreement for reduction of any amount from the gratuity is void and therefore, Annexure A1 cannot be acted upon.

3. Gratuity is payable to the petitioner on the basis of Rules contained in R.3, Part III of the Kerala Service Rules. R.3 thereof makes it clear that the amount due from retired employees towards Government Companies can be deducted from the Gratuity if they consent for it and only the balance amount need be paid to the incumbent. When this provision contained in the rules give right for payment of gratuity after deducting the amount due to the Government companies, after having agreed or consented in that line, the petitioner cannot now turn round and say that Annexure I is void. It is based on that statutory provisions contained in R.3 Part III of the K. S. R., amount due from the petitioner to the Government Company namely, the Kerala Financial Corporation, is sought to be recovered. Therefore, petitioner will be entitled to get only the balance, if any left, after deducting the amount made mention of by himself in Annexure A1.

4. There is no reason on the part of the respondents in delaying the balance amount if any, beyond 31.12.2000. The delay in paying the balance amount beyond 31.12.2000, on expiry of a reasonable time after submission of Annexure I, is not justified. Therefore, the respondents shall be liable to pay interest on the balance amount with effect from 1.12.2000 until the date of payment. Payment shall be effected, with interest payable at 6% at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The Original Petition is disposed of as above.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top