SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Ker) 661

K.A.ABDUL GAFOOR
Kuttan Pillai – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


JUDGMENT

K.A. Abdul Gafoor, J.

1. Petitioner retired from service while working as Last Grade Servant on 1.1.2000. Retiral benefits have been sanctioned to him as per Exts. P1 and P2 orders. In spite of the same, no gratuity has been disbursed to him, petitioner submits.

2. It is submitted by the learned Government Pleader that the petitioner had agreed for recovery of an amount of Rs. 35,738/- as per Annexure-I. Therefore, the petitioner can get only the balance amount, if any, towards gratuity. In reply thereto, petitioner contends that as per the provisions contained in S.60 of the Code of Civil Procedure, agreement for reduction of any amount from the gratuity is void and therefore, Annexure A1 cannot be acted upon.

3. Gratuity is payable to the petitioner on the basis of Rules contained in R.3, Part III of the Kerala Service Rules. R.3 thereof makes it clear that the amount due from retired employees towards Government Companies can be deducted from the Gratuity if they consent for it and only the balance amount need be paid to the incumbent. When this provision contained in the rules give right for payment of gratuity after deducting the amount due to the Government companies, af


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top