SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Ker) 393

T.L.VISWANATHA IYER
Rhomy Chandra Mohan – Appellant
Versus
Gen Convenor Balakalotsavam And Yuvajanotsavam – Respondent


JUDGMENT

T. L. Viswanatha Iyer, J.

1. There is no doubt that the petitioner is a talented girl. But that does not mean that there cannot be more talented people. It is evident from Exts. P1 to P20 that the petitioner is proficient in various fine arts. But that again does not mean that she should always be ranked first in whatever competition she participates. There can always be one better, who could be awarded a higher rank. Inability to accept this fact has led to this Writ Petition.

2. Petitioner's grievance is against her being awarded rank A grade II only in Bharathanatyam. as against A grade I aspired for. She is therefore not eligible to participate in the Trichur District Yuvajanotsavam, scheduled to be held on 23rd, 24th and 25th January, 1992 at Cherpu. Petitioner states that she is a highly accomplished girl in support of which she refers to Exts. P1 to P20. Her case is that she should have been awarded A grade I and thereby rendered eligible to participate in the Yuvajanotsavam instead of being awarded only A grade II. She has filed a petition complaining about her being relegated to A grade II as per Ext. P 21, and making request for being furnished with the names of the





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top