SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Ker) 606

P.A.MOHAMMED, G.SIVARAJAN
Manojakumari – Appellant
Versus
Bhasi – Respondent


JUDGMENT

P.A. Mohammed, J.

1. The appellant is the petitioner-wife before the Family Court, Thrissur in O.P. No. 20 of 1994, filed under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act for restitution of conjugal rights. She was the respondent in O.P. No. 352 of 1994 filed by the respondent-husband herein under Sections 12 and 13 of the said Act for declaring that the marriage is null and void. Both the petitions were tried together and a common judgment was delivered by the Court below on 16.12.1996.

2. The marriage between the parties took place on 9.1.1994 according to the custom of the community to which they belong. Immediately after the marriage wife went to the husband's house. However, the respondent has withdrawn from the company of the appellant without any reasonable cause. Therefore, she has filed the above petition on 23.5.1994. The respondent-husband thereafter filed the petition O.P. No. 352 of 1994, alleging fraud. His case is that the appellant was mentally unsound at the time of the marriage and that fact was not disclosed to him prior to the marriage. The Court below after the inquiry dismissed both the petitions. Being aggrieved by the judgment of the Court below, the wife has






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top