SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(Ker) 308

T.C.RAGHAVAN, K.K.MATHEW
Karakkat Kumaran Raman Alias Kavalappara Kottarathi Kunhikuttan Unni Alias Mooppil Nair – Appellant
Versus
Sathyanathan Unni Nair – Respondent


JUDGMENT

T.C. Raghavan, Ag.C.J.

1. The appellant filed a petition before the Subordinate Judge, Ottapalam under S.113 of the Code of Civil Procedure requesting him to slate a case and refer to the High Court the question of law whether S.7(3) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 was ultra vires the Constitution. The Subordinate Judge dismissed the petition; and thereafter, the appellant filed the petition which has given rise to this appeal before this Court under Art.228 of the Constitution to withdraw the original suit pending before the Subordinate Judge and determine the question of law stated above regarding the interpretation of the Constitution. Madhavan Nair J. dismissed the petition and hence the appeal.

2. The counsel of the contesting respondents has taken a preliminary objection [hat an appeal from such an order of a Single Judge to a Division Bench is not competent under S.5 of the Kerala High Court Act. The contention is that a petition under Art.228 of the Constitution to withdraw a suit or appeal pending before a subordinate court is not an original proceeding coming within S.5 of the High Court Act. The counsel of the appellant has brought to our notice two decisions of















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top