SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Ker) 389

K.G.BALAKRISHNAN, B.N.PATNAIK
State of Kerala – Appellant
Versus
R V S Mani – Respondent


JUDGMENT

B.N. Patnaik, J.

1. This appeal by the plaintiff is against the judgment dated 21-1-1985 in O.S.No.136 of 1983 on the file at the Addl. Sub Judge, Cochin. State of Kerala is the plaintiff. The following prayers were made by the plaintiff in the suit (a) to direct the second defendant to deliver the plaint schedule properties with damages for use and occupation at the rate of Rs.750/- per month from the date of suit till the date of realisation and (b) for a declaration that the sale effect by the Official receiver in Insolvency Proceedings No.2 of 1973 before the Sub Court, Ernakulam is null and void and it is not binding en the plaintiff. The suit was dismissed with costs.

2. The undisputed facts are as follows: The first defendant is the owner in possession of the plaint schedule properties. He was an assessee under the Kerala Sales Tax Act. He defaulted in the payment of sales tax due under various assessments made by the Sales Tax Officer, Ist Circle, Mattancherry, Cochin. The Sales Tax Officer (31st respondent herein) initiated a proceeding under S.69(2) of the Revenue Recovery Act on 25-6-1972 for realisation of a sum of Rs.9,328.10. On the issue of a certificate by the



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top