Back
High Court of Kerala
K.S.Paripoornan, J.
Pierce Leslie India Ltd - Appellant
Versus
A Ramachandran & Ors - Respondent
C.R.P. No. 1051 of 1992
Decided On : 18-02-1993
Insolvency Act - Company - Maintainability of petition filed by a company to declare a debtor as insolvent
Fact of the Case:
The company filed a petition under S.7 of the Insolvency Act to declare the debtor as insolvent. The court below held that the petition is maintainable.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petition filed by the company to declare the debtor as insolvent is maintainable under S.7 of the Insolvency Act.
Issues: The main issue was the maintainability of the petition filed by the company under S.7 of the Insolvency Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted S.7 and 8 of the Insolvency Act and held that a company, as a creditor, can file a petition against a debtor to declare them as insolvent, and there is no bar for such filing.
Final Decision: The revision was dismissed, and the court held that the petition filed by the company is maintainable. No costs were awarded.
Based on the provided legal document, the key points are as follows:
A company, as a creditor, has the legal right to file a petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency Act to declare a debtor as insolvent (!) .
The court clarified that there is no legal bar preventing a company from initiating such proceedings against a debtor, including other companies or associations (!) .
The court below correctly held that the petition filed by the company was maintainable, and the fact that the respondent was a company did not render the petition invalid [15000419420002].
The relevant provisions of the Insolvency Act, specifically Sections 7 and 8, support the view that a debtor can also file a petition to declare itself insolvent, and the law does not prohibit a creditor company from filing a petition against a debtor (!) (!) .
The revision filed by the creditor (respondent) was dismissed, affirming the maintainability of the petition filed by the company (appellant), with no costs awarded [15000419420003].
Overall, the legal interpretation confirms that a company can act as a creditor to initiate insolvency proceedings against a debtor under the relevant provisions of the Insolvency Act, and such petitions are permissible and maintainable (!) .
Would you like a more detailed analysis or assistance with related legal questions?
K. S. Paripoornan, J.
1. The first respondent in I. P. No. 2 of 1990 - a company - is the petitioner herein. In this revision, the order passed by the Court below dated 23-1-1992 is assailed. The petitioner in I. P. No. 2/90 is the first respondent in this revision. When I. P. No. 2/90, filed under S.7 of the Indian Insolvency Act, to declare the petitioner as insolvent, came up for orders, the revision - petitioner (company) scene to have taken up a plea that the petition is not maintainable as under S.8 of the Act the petition is barred. The court below held that S.8 of the Act will apply only if the 1st respondent is to be declared insolvent. The petitioner in I. P. No. 2/90 who is a debtor to respondents, seek to declare himself insolvent and so the petition is maintainable. The creditor - 1st respondent in the court below - has come up in revision.
2. I heard counsel. S.7 and 8 of the Insolvency Act are as follows:
"7. Petition and adjudication: - Subject to the conditions specified in this Act, if a debtor commits an act of insolvency, an insolvency petition may be presented either by a creditor or by the debtor, and the Court may on such petition make an order (hereinafter called an order of adjudication) adjudging him an insolvency.
Explanation: - The presentation of a petition by the debtor shall be deemed an act of insolvency within the meaning of this section, and on such petition the Court may make an order of adjudication.
8. Exemption of corporation, etc., from insolvency proceedings: - No insolvency petition shall be presented against any corporation or against any association or company registered under any enactment for the time being in force.''
A petition can be filed under S.7 of the Act, either by a creditor or by a debtor. A company, which is a creditor can file a petition against another person who is a debtor. There is no bar. If the plea of the revision - petitioner is accepted, a company cannot file a petition against any person who is a debtor to declare him as insolvent. A combined reading of S.7 and 8 of the Act would go to show that what is interdicted is a petition to declare any corporation or any association or company as so insolvent.
3. The court below was justified in holding that the petition filed before it is maintainable. The fact that the first respondent is a company is not a bar for the maintainability of the petition. There is no error of law or error of jurisdiction in the order of the court below.
4. The revision is without merit. It is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
