SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Ker) 679

High Court of Kerala
R. Bhaskaran, J.
Rajeev - Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala - Respondent
O.P. No. 34601 of 2000
Decided On : 18-12-2000

Marriage under the Special Marriage Act can be solemnized even if one party is not an Indian citizen.

Headnote:

Marriage - Special Marriage Act - Registration of Marriage

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a petition for the registration of marriage under the Special Marriage Act. The Registrar of Marriages refused to register the marriage due to one party not being an Indian citizen.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the marriage could be solemnized under the Special Marriage Act even if one party is not an Indian citizen. The court directed the second respondent to solemnize the marriage provided necessary corrections are made in the application form.

Issues: Registration of marriage under the Special Marriage Act when one party is not an Indian citizen.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the decision in Marian Eva v. State of Himachal Pradesh, which established that the marriage can be solemnized under the Special Marriage Act even if one party is not an Indian citizen.

Final Decision: The Original Petition is allowed, and the second respondent is directed to solemnize the marriage under the Special Marriage Act, subject to necessary corrections in the application form.

JUDGMENT

R. Bhaskaran, J.

1. This Original Petition is filed for a direction to the second respondent to accept the original of Ext. P1 and take necessary action on it. Ext. P1 is an application for registering the marriage under the Special Marriage Act. The submission of the learned counsel for petitioner is that the Registrar of Marriages has informed the petitioner that since one of the parties to the marriage is not an Indian citizen, the marriage cannot be registered. When this Original Petition came up for hearing, the learned Government Pleader submitted that the marriage is not registered because Ext. P1 application is not properly filled up and if proper corrections are made in the application form, the marriage will be solemnised. Learned counsel for petitioner pointed out the decision reported in Marian Eva v. State of Himachal Pradesh (AIR 1993 Himachal Pradesh 7) which shows that even if one of the parties is not an Indian citizen, the marriage can be solemnized under the Special Marriage Act. The Act also does not contain any prohibition for solemnisation of the marriage, if one of the parties is a foreigner. Therefore, this Original Petition is allowed and the second respondent is directed to solemnise the marriage under the Special Marriage Act provided the petitioner makes necessary corrections in the original of Ext. P1 and after the scrutiny of the same by the second respondent according to the Rules.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top