SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Ker) 625

K.SREEDHARAN
P. R. Ramavarma Raja – Appellant
Versus
Tahasildar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

K. Sreedharan, J.

1. Petitioner challenges Exts. P2, P4, and P6. Ext. P2 is notice of demand served on the petitioner in Form No. 10 as provided by S.34 of the Revenue Recovery Act. By that notice the petitioner was called upon to pay a sum of Rs. 2,71.157.21/- being the arrears of guarantee commission for the period between 23-10-1967 and 7-9-1978. On receipt of that notice the petitioner put in objection before the Thahasildar, Talipparamba. That objection was rejected by Ext. P4 order dated 15-10-1982. There upon the petitioner moved the District Collector. The District Collector, by Ext. P6 order dated 29-1-1983 confirmed the decision of the Tahasildar. Hence this Original Petition.

2. The short facts relevant for decision of this case are as follows:

A detailed scheme was prepared for the development of the petitioner's land. As per that plan the property belonging to the petitioner was mortgaged to the Government of Kerala to stand surety for the amount advanced. For the Government to be the guarantor for the advance to be made by the Bank, the petitioner was to pay commission at the rate of 1% of the amount guaranteed. This commission, it is alleged, has not been pa


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top