SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Ker) 487

K.P.BALANARAYANA MARAR
Moidu – Appellant
Versus
Parthasarathy – Respondent


ORDER

K.P. Balanarayana Marar, J.

1. Revision arises from an order in execution. First respondent obtained an order against respondents 2 and 3 in a rent control petition filed in 1983. The order was confirmed in appeal and revision. A petition for execution was filed by the first respondent wherein delivery was ordered. Against that order 2nd respondent filed a revision before this court which was dismissed. A revision was filed by the 3rd respondent before District Court, Palghat which also was dismissed. Revision petitioner filed a suit before Munsiff', Court. Palghat for a declaration that the order in the rent control petition is null and void and for a prohibitory injunction seeking to restrain the decree holder from executing the order. A petition was moved therein for a temporary injunction which was dismissed by the Munsiff's Court. An appeal against that order is pending before District Court, Palghat. In the meantime the decree holder filed a petition for police aid to effect delivery. Revision petitioner lodged a caveat before the executing court seeking an opportunity to be heard before passing orders granting police aid for delivery of the property Notice of the petitio




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top