K.P.BALANARAYANA MARAR
Moidu – Appellant
Versus
Parthasarathy – Respondent
K.P. Balanarayana Marar, J.
1. Revision arises from an order in execution. First respondent obtained an order against respondents 2 and 3 in a rent control petition filed in 1983. The order was confirmed in appeal and revision. A petition for execution was filed by the first respondent wherein delivery was ordered. Against that order 2nd respondent filed a revision before this court which was dismissed. A revision was filed by the 3rd respondent before District Court, Palghat which also was dismissed. Revision petitioner filed a suit before Munsiff', Court. Palghat for a declaration that the order in the rent control petition is null and void and for a prohibitory injunction seeking to restrain the decree holder from executing the order. A petition was moved therein for a temporary injunction which was dismissed by the Munsiff's Court. An appeal against that order is pending before District Court, Palghat. In the meantime the decree holder filed a petition for police aid to effect delivery. Revision petitioner lodged a caveat before the executing court seeking an opportunity to be heard before passing orders granting police aid for delivery of the property Notice of the petitio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.