Jawahar Lal Gupta, C.J.

1. Does the impugned revision of tariff, which fixes the pulse rate at sixty seconds for a call from landline phone to a mobile phone, violate Art.14 and 19 of the Constitution? And (ii) Is the revision calculated to help the private provider of service and thus, malafide? These are the basic issues that arise in the two writ petitions. The petitioners in these two cases are Members of the Kerala Legislative Assembly. They question the validity of the notifications issued by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India and the Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited. The counsel have referred to the averments in O.P.No. 15016 of 2003. These may be briefly noticed.

2. The petitioners allege that the Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Nigam) has the monopoly in providing telephone services in the country. Initially, the service was being provided by the Central Government through the Department of Telecommunications. In pursuance to the policy of liberalisation, the Government "surrendered even the basic service industries to the private sector". The Nigam was formed as a Corporation. It continues to be under the control of the Central Govern