SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Ker) 636

JACOB BENJAMIN KOSHY, K.THANKAPPAN
Pushpangadhan – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


JUDGMENT

J. B. Koshy, J.

1. Originally there were four accused in this case. The first accused became approver and he was examined in the case as PW 13. The prosecution case as correctly summarised by the Sessions Judge is as follows:

 "Prosecution case can be briefly stated as deceased Moideenkannu @ Thampy, S/o. Kochapparavuthar (hereinafter referred to as deceased) is a native of Neilippally village, Punaloor. It is alleged that the deceased had promised A2 Abraham @ Avarachan, A3 Dr. K.T. Peter (committed suicide on 30.05.1988 and hereinafter referred to as A3) and A4 Pushpangadhan @ Pushpan to counterfeit Indian currency notes for them. In this connection the deceased had received huge amounts from them for the purchase of printing press and other necessary articles, for counterfeiting Indian currency. But he has failed to do so. He has neither supplied to them counterfeit currency as promised by him nor returned the amount. When A2 to A4 demanded the repayment of the amount through the first accused Aravindan (turned Approver hereinafter referred to as PW 13) the deceased told him that he is already an accused in 4 or 5 counterfeit cases and he had to undergo sentence in connect





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top