M.M.PAREED PILLAY
Raman – Appellant
Versus
Narayanan – Respondent
M.M. Pareed Pillay, J.
1. Appellants are defendants 1 and 2. First appellant died and additional appellants 3 to 10 were impleaded, Plaintiff filed the suit for partition and a preliminary decree was passed by the Trial Court and it C has been confirmed by the lower appellate Court.
2. Plaintiff and defendants 1 and 2 are brothers. Third defendant is the son of the first defendant. Plaintiff and defendants 1 and 2 are the sons of Cheeru and Ittianandan. It is the case of the plaintiff that the plaint schedule property was obtained by Cheeru as per Ext. A6 assignment dated 21/10/1096 M. E. from her husband Ittianandan, that Cheeru executed Ext A2 settlement deed on 01/05/1951 in favour of the plaintiff and defendants 1 and 2 reserving life interest to her, that Cheeru died on 13/04/1977 and that plaintiff and defendants 1 and 2 are entitled to the D property. Plaintiff claims 1/3rd share. Out of 37 cents of property, an area having 8. 50 cents was acquired by the State. Item 1 in the plaint schedule is 28.50 cents of property whereas Item 2 is the land acquisition amount awarded. Second defendant has supported the case of the plaintiff and he also claimed partition. Defendants
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.