SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(Ker) 281

C.A.VAIDIALINGAM
Narayana Pai – Appellant
Versus
Vittala Shenoi – Respondent


ORDER

C.A. Vaidialingam, J.

1. This Civil Revision Petition and Civil Miscellaneous Appeal arise out of an order passed by the Subordinate Judge of Parur directing the Receiver appointed by that court to hand over possession of the suit properties to defendants 6 to 9.

2. It is necessary to state very briefly the events leading up to this C. R. P. and C. M. A.

3. Plaintiffs, claiming to be persons interested in the proper administration of the trust, have filed O. S. No. 72 of 1957 on the file of the Subordinate Judge's Court of Parur for a declaration that the election of defendants 1 to 5 to the Managing Committee under a scheme is not valid and legal and that they are not entitled to function as people in charge of the management of the institution. In the suit itself the plaintiffs have also asked for an injunction restraining defendants 1 to 5 from taking and defendants 6 to 9 from delivering charge to the members of the new committee. It is also seen that defendants 6 to 10 who are members of the old committee ceased to be in the management on 24-7-1957 by virtue of the clauses in the scheme which governs the administration of the said institution. In consequence an election app


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top