C.A.VAIDIALINGAM
Narayana Pai – Appellant
Versus
Vittala Shenoi – Respondent
C.A. Vaidialingam, J.
1. This Civil Revision Petition and Civil Miscellaneous Appeal arise out of an order passed by the Subordinate Judge of Parur directing the Receiver appointed by that court to hand over possession of the suit properties to defendants 6 to 9.
2. It is necessary to state very briefly the events leading up to this C. R. P. and C. M. A.
3. Plaintiffs, claiming to be persons interested in the proper administration of the trust, have filed O. S. No. 72 of 1957 on the file of the Subordinate Judge's Court of Parur for a declaration that the election of defendants 1 to 5 to the Managing Committee under a scheme is not valid and legal and that they are not entitled to function as people in charge of the management of the institution. In the suit itself the plaintiffs have also asked for an injunction restraining defendants 1 to 5 from taking and defendants 6 to 9 from delivering charge to the members of the new committee. It is also seen that defendants 6 to 10 who are members of the old committee ceased to be in the management on 24-7-1957 by virtue of the clauses in the scheme which governs the administration of the said institution. In consequence an election app
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.