SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Ker) 515

S.PADMANABHAN, G.RAJASEKHARAN
Royson – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S. Padmanaban, J.

1. The two appellants in Criminal Appeal No. 330 of 1986 were tried and convicted for offences punishable under S.302, 379 and 201 with the aid of S.34 of the Indian Penal Code. For murder, life imprisonment was awarded to both of them. No separate sentence was given for the other offences. Criminal Appeal No. 451 of 1986 was filed by the State for enhancement of the sentence.

2. Deceased Chandran Nair and PW 1 Appukuttan were close friends hailing from Thiruvananthapuram. They were engaged in selling clothes on instalment basis at Poothole in Thrissur. Their joint residence was in one of the rooms in the residential building of PW 3 at Adiyat lane, Poothole. PW 2 Ibrahim is a shop owner at Poothole. He was the common friend of Chandran Nair and PW 1. First accused Royson alias Paul was the driver of the second accused Madhavan. The second accused was having a white tourist ambassador car, KEE 5817, and a tempo van. These two appellants were also friends of Chandran Nair. Second accused had some business failure and he was in financial difficulties.

3. Accused 1 and 2 persuaded Chandran Nair to join them in a partnership for buying and selling automobiles. Th







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top