SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Ker) 364

S.VELU PILLAI
Vittala Shenoi – Appellant
Versus
Cochin Devaswom Board – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S. Velu Pillai, J.

1. The two petitioners and others made three applications, Exts. R 1 to R 3, to the Cochin Devaswom Board, the first respondent, for a declaration under S.114 of the Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, 1950, which may be referred to hereafter as the Act, that the Azheekal Sri Varaha Devaswom Temple, which may be referred to hereafter as the Temple, is not an 'institution' within the meaning of the Act. S.114, sub-s.(1), (2) and (3) of the Act reads as follows:

114(1). "If any dispute arises as to whether any institution falls within the term 'institution' as defined in Part II of this Act, such dispute shall be decided by the Board and the decision of the Board shall be published in the Gazette."

(2). "Any person affected by a decision of the Board under sub-s.(1) may within six months from the date of publication of the decision of the Board in the Gazette, institute a suit in the court to modify or set aside such decision".

(3). "Subject to the final decree in the suit provided for in sub-s.(2), the decision of the Board shall be final."

An institution is defined by S.61(6) of the Act, the material part of which reads as follows :

61(6). "In














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top