T.C.RAGHAVAN
Nabeesa Saivu – Appellant
Versus
Samadhana Ammal – Respondent
T.C. Raghavan, J.
1. The question involved in this Civil Revision Petition relates to the amount of court fee that is payable on a plaint for partition and separate possession of his share by an alienee from one or more of the cosharers in a joint family.
2. The properties involved in the suit in the lower court belonged to one Samuel Dairyam who was the brother of defendants 1 to 6 and the son of one Pakkyam Pillai. Samuel Dairyam died and his father Pakkyam Pillai inherited the plaint properties from his son. On his death his children, defendants 1 to 6 and the husband of the 7th defendant and Samadhanammal, the widow of Pakkayam Pillai inherited the properties. Defendants 5 and 6, Samadhanammal and the husband of the 7th defendant executed a mortgage deed in respect of their rights in the plaint properties in favour of the plaintiff. The plaintiff filed a suit on this mortgage, obtained a decree and in execution of the same purchased the rights of the mortgagors in court auction and obtained symbolical delivery of their share. Thus the plaintiff became entitled to 4 out of the 8 shares in the plaint properties. The present suit has been brought for partition of the plaint pro
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.