SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Ker) 344

T.C.RAGHAVAN
Nabeesa Saivu – Appellant
Versus
Samadhana Ammal – Respondent


ORDER

T.C. Raghavan, J.

1. The question involved in this Civil Revision Petition relates to the amount of court fee that is payable on a plaint for partition and separate possession of his share by an alienee from one or more of the cosharers in a joint family.

2. The properties involved in the suit in the lower court belonged to one Samuel Dairyam who was the brother of defendants 1 to 6 and the son of one Pakkyam Pillai. Samuel Dairyam died and his father Pakkyam Pillai inherited the plaint properties from his son. On his death his children, defendants 1 to 6 and the husband of the 7th defendant and Samadhanammal, the widow of Pakkayam Pillai inherited the properties. Defendants 5 and 6, Samadhanammal and the husband of the 7th defendant executed a mortgage deed in respect of their rights in the plaint properties in favour of the plaintiff. The plaintiff filed a suit on this mortgage, obtained a decree and in execution of the same purchased the rights of the mortgagors in court auction and obtained symbolical delivery of their share. Thus the plaintiff became entitled to 4 out of the 8 shares in the plaint properties. The present suit has been brought for partition of the plaint pro






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top