BELLUR NARAYANASWAMY SRIKRISHNA, G.SIVARAJAN
Sanjayan – Appellant
Versus
Tahsildar – Respondent
B. N. Srikrishna, C. J.
1. Appeals admitted. Notices made returnable forthwith. Respondents in all three appeals waive service through learned counsel. By consent, appeals called out for hearing and heard.
2. In all these three appeals the vehicles of the appellants were seized on the allegation that they were illegally transporting sand from the river banks. In W. A. No. 1286 and 1287 of 2002 by Ext. P2 order issued by the Sub Collector, Adoor, who is also the Revenue Divisional Officer, the appellants were informed that their lorries had been seized for unauthorised transporting of river sand and a sum of Rs. 25,000/- was imposed as fine for transporting river sand without any valid pass. The Tahsildar, Kozhencherry was directed to collect the sum of Rs. 25,000/- as fine and release the lorries after unloading the river sand from where it was collected. In W. A. No. 1330 of 2002, by Ext. P4 order made by Tahsildar, Mallappally, purportedly under the Mines and Minerals (Development Regulation) Act, 1957 read with R.60A of the Kerala Minor Minerals Concession Act, 1967, a sum of Rs. 25,000/- was levied as maximum penalty with a direction for re-depositing the sand from the lo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.