SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Ker) 739

V.RAMKUMAR
Sasidharan – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


JUDGMENT

V. Ramkumar

1. In this appeal preferred from the Central Prison, Thiruvananthapuram, the appellant who was the sole accused in S.C. No. 787/2001 on the file of the Addl. Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court (Adhoc) No. I, Thiruvananthapuram, challenges the conviction entered and the sentence passed against him for an offences punishable under Section 55 (a) of the Abkari Act.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 15-05-1998 at 5 p.m. while the Excise Preventive Officer (P.W.5) attached to the Excise Office, Kazhakuttom was proceeding on patrol duty along the Panachamoodu-Murukkumpuzhakadavu road they came across the accused carrying a black plastic can having a capacity of 2 litres containing two litres of illicit arrack and that the accused has thereby committed offences punishable under Sections 8(1) and 58 of the Abkari Act.

3. On the accused pleading not guilty to the charge framed against him by the court below for an offence punishable under CRL. APPEAL NO. 1128 OF 2006 Section 55(a) of the Abkari Act, the prosecution was permitted to adduce evidence in support of its case. The prosecution altogether examined 6 witnesses as P.Ws 1 to 6 and got marked 5 documents as Exts.












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top