SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Ker) 1017

K.T.SANKARAN
Jose Valiyaveedan – Appellant
Versus
Giri K George – Respondent


JUDGMENT

K.T. Sankaran, J.

1. The petitioner filed O.S.No.240 of 2008 on the file of the Court of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Kottayam, against the respondent for realisation of money on the foot of a promissory note. The respondent/defendant denied the execution of the promissory note. He contended that he had joined a chitty run by the plaintiff and while receiving the prize amount, he was forced to handover a blank signed cheque, two signed blank papers and two unfilled printed forms. Though the amount covered by the chitty was repaid, the signed papers were not handed over. The defendant further contended that the plaintiff has filled the blank portions in the printed form and fabricated the suit promissory note.

2. The plaintiff was examined as PW1 and the defendant was examined as DW1.

3. After closing the evidence, the petitioner/plaintiff filed I.A.No.1976 of 2010 to recall the plaintiff and to mark certified copies of certain documents. That application was allowed by Ext.P7 order dated 20.8.2010 on payment of costs and the plaintiff was permitted to prove the documents "subject to admissibility".

4. Thereafter, the petitioner/plaintiff filed a proof affidavit, in which, h
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top