SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Ker) 703

K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR
Praveen A. – Appellant
Versus
High Court Of Kerala – Respondent


JUDGMENT

K.Balakrishnan Nair, J.

1. The petitioners in these writ petitions are physically handicapped persons. They mainly claim two reliefs. The first relief is that reservation may be provided in the matter of recruitment to the post of Munsiff Magistrate to physically handicapped persons. The second claim is that they are entitled to get age relaxation upto ten years, over and above the age limit prescribed in the notification. The first point raised by them, regarding reservation, is covered against them by the decision of this Court in WP (C) No. 14604 of 2007 dated 12/06/2007.

2. In support of the second claim, the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 18117 of 2007 relied on Ext. P4 order of the Government dated 13/05/1964. The said order authorised the Public Service Commission and appointing authorities to include a condition in notifications issued by them, inviting applications for appointment, that physically handicapped persons will get relaxation of age upto ten years, if they are found otherwise suitable and competent to discharge the duties attached to the post. The petitioner in Writ Petition No. 18366 of 2007 relied on GO (P) No. 158/73/PD dated 29/05/1973, Ext. P4 in the






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top