SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Ker) 700

M.N.KRISHNAN
Mathew K. V. – Appellant
Versus
Paul Varghese – Respondent


JUDGMENT

M.N. Krishnan, J.

1. This appeal is preferred against the award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Ernakulam in OP (MV) 2755/00. The claimant has been awarded a total compensation of Rs.26,830/-. Dissatisfied with the same the claimant has come up in appeal. The Tribunal estimated the value of the spare parts at Rs.36,660/-, deducted 50% and it also reduced the labour charges to Rs.7,500/-. In the decision reported in M. R. Narahari Pandit v. Veenadevi Jalan, 1997 ACJ 245, the Karnataka High Court had taken the view following an earlier decision of the same Court to the effect that the question of depreciation would arise only when the vehicle becomes a scrap or suffers total loss for which the damages have to be determined. When it is granted, to meet the actual expenses incurred for the repairs and replacement, the question of depreciation will not arise. It is also held that when the vehicle is repaired by replacing new spare parts, the actual cost of new spare parts had to be given to the owner of the vehicle. It has to be remembered it is to put back the vehicle into a roadworthy condition, the spare parts are changed. Therefore I am inclined to hold that the depre


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top