SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Ker) 1027

S.SIRI JAGAN, K.RAMAKRISHNAN
Oriental Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Sivan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S. Siri Jagan, J.

1. A question, which disturbs our judicial conscience, arises in these two appeals. The question is as to whether, the fact that the driver whose negligence in driving the vehicle caused accident in a motor accident claim, had only a fake driving licence, which was not known to the owner of the vehicle, would result in a situation where neither the driver nor the owner would not be liable to reimburse to the insurance company, the amount paid by the insurance company to the claimants, on account of the violation of the policy condition that the driver driving the insured vehicle should possess a valid driving licence.

2. The question arises in the following fact situation: The appellant is the insurance company in O.P.(M.V).Nos.8 and 9 of 1997 before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Palakkad, both of which arose from the same accident. The same were filed by the dependants of deceased Devaki and Beepathumma, who died in a motor accident caused by the negligent driving of the vehicle by the 1st respondent herein, which was owned by the 2nd respondent. The Tribunal, after finding negligence on the part of the driver of the vehicle, awarded compensation of








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top