SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Ker) 1155

BHABANI PRASAD RAY
Unnikrishnan Nair – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


ORDER

B.P. Ray, J.

1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State.

2. The petitioner is accused No. 38 in Crime No. 111 of 2011 of C.B.C.I.D., Ernakulam for offences punishable under Sections 366A, 376(2)(g), 354 202 and 120-B r/w Section 34 I.P.C. Being aggrieved by the order dated 21.06.2011 refusing to issue certified copy of the statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C in Crime Case No. 346 of 2011 of North Paravur Police Station by the Judicial First Class Magistrate, North Paravur, the petitioner has filed this application. After having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State, I am of the view that the 164 statement which is part of record cannot be denied to this petitioner. Therefore, I direct the learned Magistrate to issue a certified copy of the statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C in Crime Case No. 346/2011 of North Paravur Police Station within a week from the date of making a fresh application.

This application is disposed of as above.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top