SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Ker) 946

P UBAID
Ramesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


ORDER

P. Ubaid, J.

1. A vehicle belonging to the revision petitioner was seized by the Sub Inspector of Police, Attingal under S. 21(4) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (for short, 'the Act'), when he found red earth being transported in the said vehicle in violation of S. 4(1A) of the Act. On seizure, the Sub Inspector, suo motu, registered a crime against the revision petitioner. However, seizure of the property was not reported to the learned Magistrate having jurisdiction. When nothing proceeded further at the hands of the police, the revision petitioner moved the learned Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Attingal with C.M.P. No. 3608/2014 under S. 457 Cr.P.C., for getting custody of the vehicle seized by the police. The vehicle involved is a tipper lorry bearing No. KL-16-L-4739. Seizure was made by the police on 21.7.2014. The application filed by the revision petitioner under S. 457 Cr.P.C. was resisted by the prosecution on the contention that the fact of seizure has already been reported to the District Collector, and that the vehicle is liable for confiscation by the District Collector. The legal objection raised by the prosecution is













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top