SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Ker) 1567

A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI
Ramunni Menon – Appellant
Versus
Thankan Alias Rugmini Amma – Respondent


JUDGMENT

A.V. Ramakrishna Pillai, J.

1. The legal representatives of the deceased 2nd defendant in the original suit are in appeal. The respondents are the legal representatives of the deceased 1st plaintiff, plaintiffs 2 & 3 and defendants 3 & 5-11 in the original suit.

2. The suit was filed by deceased Aravindakshan Nair (the 1st plaintiff) along with respondents 1 and 2 herein for recovery of the possession of the property. In the plaint, it was alleged that the plaint schedule property belonged to the 1st defendant and her brother, Sankunni Nair, as per a sale deed No.2218/1117 M.E. After the death of Sankunni Nair, the legal heirs of Sankunni Nair assigned half right over the said property, which they inherited from Sankunni Nair, to Kunhikavamma, who is the mother of defendants 1 to 4. The 1st defendant and Kunhikkavamma became the co-owners of the plaint schedule property. One Kunkumath Parangodan Nair, who was the predecessor in interest of the plaintiffs, took the plaint schedule property on lease on 24.10.1121. Though the lease was for a period of one year, he continued the tenancy on the same terms and conditions. After the death of Parangodan Nair, the suit property was pa

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top