Abdul Noushad – Appellant
Versus
Helen – Respondent
V. Chitambaresh, J.
1. The suit in O.S. No. 74/2012 on the file of the Court of the Subordinate Judge of Ottappalam is one for specific performance of Ext. A1 agreement for sale of the property. It is the case of the plaintiff that a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- was paid as advance out of the total sale consideration of Rs. 14,00,000/- to the defendant on the date of the agreement. The suit is essentially for specific performance to have the sale deed executed even though there is an alternative prayer for return of the amount paid as advance. The court below has dismissed the suit on the ground of limitation and also for the reason that the plaintiff was not ready and willing to perform his part of the contract.
2. The court fee was computed on the amount of the sale consideration as is warranted under Section 42(a) of the Kerala Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1959 (the 'Act' for short). The court fee payable in the Regular First Appeal at the instance of the plaintiff shall be the same as that shown in the suit on the subject matter as per Section 52 of the Act. One-third of the court fee payable to the tune of Rs. 43,467/- was remitted at the time of admission of the Regular Fi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.