SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Ker) 1404

THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
State of Kerala – Appellant
Versus
Syed Muhammed – Respondent


ORDER

Devan Ramachandran, J.

1. State of Kerala has filed the above revision assailing the order of the Kerala Value Added Tax Additional Appellate Tribunal, Palakkad ('the Tribunal' for short), by which it had set aside the orders of assessment and the order of the first appellate authority affirming the assessment, as prayed for by the respondent herein in their appeal before it.

2. The question of law raised in this revision by the State, inter alia, is whether the discounts received by the assessee much after purchase from the supplier would have to be deemed as turn over as per Explanation VII to Section 2(li) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act ('the Act' for short) or whether it would have to be treated as either a 'cash discount' or 'trade discount' as defined by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax (Law), Board of Revenue (Taxes), Ernakulam v. Advani Oerlikon (P) Limited, 45 STC 32 (SO).

3. The respondent is a registered dealer under the Act and they are trading in cement. They had filed the annual return for the year 2010-11 conceding a total sales turn over of Rs. 1,66,33,860/-. It was also conceded by the assessee that it had obtained an amount of Rs.


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top