SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Ker) 1366

P.D.RAJAN
Valsan – Appellant
Versus
Mananthody Police Station – Respondent


ORDER

1. The short question that arises in this case is whether a non-compoundable case can be compounded under Section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short 'Cr.P.C') ?

Revision petitioners, who are the accused, have preferred this revision petition against the concurrent judgment in Crl.A.33 of 2003 of Sessions Judge, Wayanad. They were charge sheeted in CC.193 of 2001 before Judicial First Class Magistrate II, Mananthavady under Section 323, 326 read with 34 IPC. After trial the learned Magistrate convicted the accused under Section 323 and 326 read with 34 IPC and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for six months under Section 323 r/w 34 IPC, sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for 18 months with fine of Rs.2000/- under Section 326 r/w 34 IPC, in default, simple imprisonment for six months. Against that accused preferred a criminal appeal before Sessions Judge, Wayanad where the learned Sessions Judge dismissed the appeal. Being aggrieved by that, they preferred this revision petition.

2. The charge against the accused is that on 11.11.1996 at 6.30 am, while PW1 was proceeding to the Milk Society, the accused hide near a tree, jumped in front of him, A2 beat










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top