SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Ker) 1349

B.KEMAL PASHA
Karunakaran – Appellant
Versus
Sadasivan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

B. Kemal Pasha, J.

1. Challenging the concurrent findings entered by the Additional Munsiff's Court, Ernakulam in O.S.No.735 of 2009, followed by those of the Subordinate Judge's Court, Ernakulam in A.S.No.87 of 2011, the defendant in O.S.No.735 of 2009 has come up with this second appeal.

2. The suit is one for a decree of perpetual injunction, restraining the defendant, his men and agents from trespassing into plaint A schedule property, and from interfering with the plaintiffs' peaceable possession and enjoyment of plaint A schedule property, apart from enjoying the right of way of the defendant also, over plaint A schedule property.

3. The 1st plaintiff and defendant are direct brothers. The plaint A schedule property is having an extent of 0.750 cents in Sy.No.31/11A of the Manakkunnam Village, which is having a length of 16 metres and a width of 2 metres from the northern most portion of the 6 cents of property, which remained with the legal heirs of late Ayyappan.

4. The aforesaid 6 cents of property originally belonged to late Ayyappan. The 1st plaintiff, the defendant, and 6 others were the children of late Ayyappan. Ayyappan died intestate in respect of the said 6 cen














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top