SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Ker) 1380

K.VINOD CHANDRAN
Jilmon John – Appellant
Versus
Manakad Grama Panchayath – Respondent


JUDGMENT

K.Vinod Chandran,J.

1. All these writ petitions deal with the establishment of a hot mix plant; two for and one against. Arguments have been addressed by the parties based on the documents produced in W.P(C) No.17418 of 2016; which is filed by the co-owners of the property one of whom intends to set up the unit in the property; who is the sole petitioner in W.P.(C) No.8725 of 2016. The first writ petition challenge the cancellation of a permission to establish the unit and the second challenge the subsequent rejection of an application for construction of building, on the ground of the pending litigation before this Court. W.P.(C).No.16515 of 2016 is filed by a neighbouring property owner, who raised a complaint against the establishment of the unit before the Panchayat and sought for implementation of the stop memo issued by the Panchayat, styling the said stop memo to be a prohibitory order against the establishment itself.

2. The petitioners 1 and 2 in W.P.(C) No.17418 of 2016; which writ petition is referred to, are co-owners of a property having an extent of 2.72 acres of land in Survey No.170/10, 11, 7, 8, 9 of Manacad Village in Thodupuzha Taluk; wherein setting up of














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top