ANNIE JOHN
Sanoop S/o. Krishnankutty – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala Represented By The Public Prosecutor – Respondent
The petitioner is the first accused in Crime No. 50 of 2018 of Thrithala Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 406, 420 and 34 IPC.
2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner and his wife while working in Dubai made the de facto complainant to believe that if he invest money in his business of supplying building material and petroleum products, he would be provided profit for such investment and accordingly they invested Rs.2,18,00,000/-. It is further alleged that the petitioner has not returned the money as assured and thereby he has committed the aforesaid offence.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was working as an employee of the company owned by the de facto complainant. The said company was engaged in the supply of building materials. The de facto complainant has canvassed many NRIs in Dubai for investing in his business venture. Some of the NRIs, who had acquaintance with the petitioner, also invested money in his business concern. The de facto complainant had provided profit to the investors as offered during the initial stages. Later, when the investors were not provided with profit, they star
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.