C.K.ABDUL REHIM, SHIRCY V.
Britannia Industries Limited – Appellant
Versus
R. Easwaran S/o. Ramaswamy, Proprietor, Adithya Enterprises – Respondent
C.K. Abdul Rehim, J.
Since the appellant is common in all these cases and since the orders impugned are passed by the same District Court and since the nature of the orders impugned in all these appeals are identical, we have considered these appeals together and disposed of through this common judgment.
2. The appellant company is challenging the orders passed by the District Court, Manjeri in OP (Arb) Nos.141/2017, 150/2017, 151/2017 & 149/2017, respectively in the above appeals. The original petitions were instituted before the District Court by various petitioners, who are 'authorised wholesalers' of the appellant company, by invoking Section 9 (1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act (herein after referred to as 'the Act' for short). The relief sought for in the original petitions were to issue mandatory injunction commanding the appellant to continue with 'distributorship' of the petitioners in accordance with the terms of the agreement entered between the parties and to supply the products of the company to them on the basis of the orders placed; and also to restrain the appellants from appointing any new 'distributors' in the place of the petitioners in any part
B.E. Simoese Von Staraburg Niedenthal and another V. Chhattisgarh Investment Limited
Central Inland Water Transport Corporation Limited Vs. Brojo Nath Ganguly and another
Indus Mobile Distribution Private Limited Vs. Datawind Innovations Private Limited
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.