SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Ker) 255

ANTONY DOMINIC, DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
Ayisha Beegam – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Kurian George Kannanthanam.
For the Respondents: Titus Mani Vettom, P. Santhosh Kumar, N. Nagaresh.

JUDGMENT

Dama Seshadri Naidu, J.

Introduction:

1. A few students, under All India Quota (NEET), joined the post-graduate medical courses, both in Government and private colleges. At the time of their joining the course, the students’ parents executed a bond with the college management. The bond stipulated that the students would have their certificates-submitted during admission-released only after their completing “one-year compulsory employment or on payment of the compensation.”

2. The bond provides for remedial mechanism if the student breaches the condition: the student’s failing to serve in the State the mandatory period of one-year or, in the alternative, failing to compensate the State, the management can compel the parent to compensate; the recovery may be from the parent’s properties, movable or immovable. Many students from other States, after passing out, refused to comply with the bond conditions; instead they questioned them. It led to litigation across the nation, Kerala included.

Facts:

3. We have before us a batch of Writ Appeals filed by a medical college, the Gov













































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top